Condo Critic: What's not to like about Riverdale?
November 21, 2009
Christopher Hume
Like many old Toronto neighbourhoods, Riverdale has been a focus of the gentrifying hordes for several decades.
With its fine housing stock, mostly early 20th century, and downtown co-ordinates, it's not hard to understand its appeal. More than that, the area has more than its fair share of green space – Riverdale and Withrow parks come to mind.
But except for the industrial structures farther south, Riverdale has remained largely condo-free. The buildings are almost exclusively lowrise residential, and there are only a few main streets running through the district. In other words, development opportunities are few and far between.
Still, the flavour has changed significantly. A good example is the recent disappearance of a convenience store on Broadview south of Riverdale Ave. It was closed to make way for a cafe, which may seem appropriate but which will exacerbate the area's lack of retail. Indeed, if it weren't for Chinatown East, there would little shopping at all.
Perhaps that's what attracts people; the nearly total residential content of Riverdale makes it feel set slightly apart from the larger community. Though the roar of the city is always audible, the source remains hidden.
chume@thestar.ca
Condo Critic
PRINTERS ROW LOFTS, 525 LOGAN AVE.: This adaptive re-use scheme is one of few condo projects in Riverdale. It dates from an earlier era when a few businesses did manage to establish themselves in what is otherwise an overwhelmingly domestic precinct.
This strangely church-like structure fits so well into its context, it's just about invisible. Those who do take the time to stop and look will be rewarded with the prospect of a modest but dignified building that has simple lines and good bones.
Dating from 1911, it was constructed by Bell Telephone, which might explain the big windows and box-like shape.
But in this case, simplicity becomes a virtue. Surrounded on all sides by houses, the three-storey redbrick slab feels right at home. It also provides a welcome note of variety in a neighbourhood that tends to be architecturally homogeneous.
Best of all, perhaps, the renovated structure seems ideally suited to its new use. The transition has been made seamlessly.
Grade: A
WHAT DO YOU THINK? Email condocritic@thestar.ca.
Read more Condo Critic: - 5 Condos that tower above the rest
-
Queensway has lack of connection
-
Future of Ellesmere could heal 'Scarberia's' wounds-
West is best, as Wallace Ave. shows
-
Jane/Finch rehab faces uncertain future
-
When the car becomes king we all lose-
Past and present can co-exist-
New projects pay little respect to past
-
Diversity at heart of Richmond experience -
Esplanade appeal easy to understand
-
Development anticipates future-
King St. E. has it all, let's not ruin it now-
Quiet, domestic and lowrise Roncesvalles-
Roncesvalles retains its village flavour-
Industrial architecture improves with age-
Offices, condos complete transformation -
Sum not greater than the parts
-
New Regent Park revitalizing neighbourhood-
East end evolution more interesting than ever
-
Aging area shows signs of new urbanism
-
Industrial Carlaw evolving into residential neighbourhood -
Neglected district shows great potential
-
Bloor certainly one of the best streets
-
Complex has the right height and heft for location
-
Residential revival has mixed results
-
'A ghastly mix of confused intentions'-
Well situated street is a hodge podge
-
Mt. Pleasant bridges mythical divide-
Boom adds housing to urban byways-
Throughfare thoroughly suburban-
Jarvis St. ready for its second closeup
-
Pedestrians take back seat to cars here-
Re-imagining Scarborough-
Corner represents past and future-
River cries for development -
An exercise in built chaos -
Treating the past with respect-
New and old clash on Richmond-
Where east never meets west
Toronto Star