ARCHITECTURE
Condo Critic: Cityplace proving its critics wrong
March 13, 2010
Christopher Hume
Cityplace has its fair share of detractors, but the fact is that it appears ready to become one of the most successful planned neighbourhoods in Toronto.
Development of the old railway lands started on the east side of Spadina and now continues on the west. Clearly, the lessons learned on the former were applied on the latter. Though there's much skepticism about this sort of urban mega-development, Cityplace seems to be getting it right.
As much as anything, this success is based on a solid understanding on the importance of the public realm. Much remains to be finished, but the attention to public amenities such as sidewalks, parks and even architecture has already made a difference.
Certainly, Cityplace will not be another St. James Town in terms of what's going on at street level. At Cityplace, roads are connected and sidewalks lined with planters. There are even a few small squares and public art pieces. The quality of the planning is matched by the quality of the architecture, which is remarkably sophisticated.
The most obvious problem is that of Spadina, which bisects the site. Where it meets Bremner Blvd./Fort York Dr., Spadina is fully nine lanes wide, seven for cars, two for streetcars. The reason, of course, is that Spadina has been turned into an on/off ramp for the Gardiner Expressway and Lake Shore Blvd.
Why the city would allow such a use in an area set aside for residential development remains a mystery. It looks like another example of trying to have it both ways; clearly, the idea was to allow the suburbanization of Toronto to continue while accommodating urban intensification.
At some point, the city will have to decide in which direction it wants to go.
Condo Critic
LUNA, 8 TELEGRAM MEWS: With this project, the much-praised
"Vancouver model" comes to Toronto. The block-sized complex consists of
two towers, 38 and 18 storeys, sitting atop a podium building that
includes townhouses and retail. The lower section does all the hard
work, defining the context and creating a streetscape.
The
materials, glass and brick, seem appropriate for a complex that is
contemporary but which also inhabits land that comes out of Toronto's
industrial past.
One also can't help but admire the
architecture, which, without being precious, manages to be engaging
both on street level and from farther afield. Though some of the
balconies are handled awkwardly, these buildings bring a nice
sculptural quality to the skyline.
The wooden fences and
dividers that run along the fronts of the townhouses add a bit of
warmth to the place. Of course, everything here is still brand new;
planters await planting and trees have yet to take root. A pathway
extending along the north side of the site succeeds in incorporating
the railway tracks into the whole; it becomes almost scenic.
Though
there are no mountains in the distance and Lake Ontario is too far to
see, Cityplace has a definite Vancouver feel, most obviously in the
tower-on-a-base approach but also in the acceptance of towers. In a
situation like this, the issue is to figure out how the building meets
grade.
In St. James Town, highrises shoot out of the ground and
continue upwards until they stop, abruptly. In Vancouver, the towers
don't meet the ground directly; the transition is more sensitively
handled by the podium.
One can't help but wonder about the
wisdom of lining these streets with residential buildings instead of
retail, but there can be no doubt Cityplace is an emerging
neighbourhood, not simply a collection of condo towers.
GRADE: A
WHAT DO YOU THINK? Email: condocritic@thestar.ca.
Read more Condo Critic
- 5 Condos that tower above the rest
- Yorkville rich with everything but substance
- Aging neighbourhood rediscovered
- Eglinton a victim of good intentions
- Wellesley struggles for an identity
- Charles sustains its charm
- Change is good at Yonge/Eglinton
- Tower fits into scenic location
- 'Series of boxes' still fits into Ave and Dav
- Despite change, King St. E. keeps identity
- What's not to like about Riverdale?
- Queensway has lack of connection
- Future of Ellesmere could heal 'Scarberia's' wounds
- West is best, as Wallace Ave. shows
- Jane/Finch rehab faces uncertain future
- When the car becomes king we all lose
- Past and present can co-exist
- New projects pay little respect to past
- Diversity at heart of Richmond experience
- Esplanade appeal easy to understand
- Development anticipates future
- King St. E. has it all, let's not ruin it now
- Quiet, domestic and lowrise Roncesvalles
- Roncesvalles retains its village flavour
- Industrial architecture improves with age
- Offices, condos complete transformation
- Sum not greater than the parts
- New Regent Park revitalizing neighbourhood
- East end evolution more interesting than ever
- Aging area shows signs of new urbanism
- Industrial Carlaw evolving into residential neighbourhood
- Neglected district shows great potential
- Bloor certainly one of the best streets
- Complex has the right height and heft for location
- Residential revival has mixed results
- 'A ghastly mix of confused intentions'
- Well situated street is a hodge podge
- Mt. Pleasant bridges mythical divide
- Boom adds housing to urban byways
- Throughfare thoroughly suburban
- Jarvis St. ready for its second closeup
- Pedestrians take back seat to cars here
- Re-imagining Scarborough
- Corner represents past and future
- River cries for development
- An exercise in built chaos
- Treating the past with respect
- New and old clash on Richmond
Toronto Star